- The Scholarly Letter
- Posts
- Research Is (Not) A Purely Human Endeavour
Research Is (Not) A Purely Human Endeavour
Plus are chemistry professors really paid more than anthropologists?

πyour Scholarly Digest 6th March, 2025
Academia essentials hand-picked fortnightly for the informed scholar
Image Courtesy: National Gallery of Art, Washington
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up to get it in your inbox every week.
Know someone who will enjoy The Scholarly Letter? Forward it to them.
Hey Scholar, here's what we have for you this week:
PhD and postdoctoral opportunities π¦πΊ π¬π§ π³π± π©π°;
Is research a completely human endeavour (and weβre not talking about animals);
Are chemistry professors really paid more than anthropologists?
Social science for national security loses funding;
and other carefully curated distractions from your actual work.
Brain Food
Is Research a Completely Human Endeavor?
In one sense, research is undeniably humanβit begins with innately human faculties like imagination, creativity, judgment, insight - the list goes on. It is also aimed at advancing human society. Both of these taken together might be enough to argue that research is a human endeavour. But is that all there is to research?
This Digest is for Paid Subscribers
Become a paid subscriber to read the rest of this Digest and access our full archive.
Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.
Paid subscribers receive an edition of The Scholarly Letter every Thursday: :
- β’ Two editions of πThe Digest every month
- β’ Two editions of π The Thursday Essay