And with them, what cultural and ideological imports are we quietly welcoming into how we conduct our research, how we produce knowledge, and how we relate to knowledge itself?
Visualising, Violating, and Humanizing Scholarship
Three weeks ago, COPE published new guidance for how to handle retractions of published articles - highlighting just how pressing the problem is becoming.
“The job of the scholar is to contribute to society, and if they are not doing so, they are not successful.” And here, we will agree but with one vital amendment.
We had already spent decades building a world organised around writing more and more, faster and faster, until abundance itself began to change what writing was worth.
We both love the disciplines we have devoted ourselves to. We both tell stories about their decline, each of us locating the causes in ways that no doubt contain blind spots of their own.
The gown becomes almost tragicomic in this context. Rather than interrogating why symbolic hierarchy matters so much in academia, the solution becomes extending access to its ceremonial symbols.
Far from exposing an intellectual life that merely dresses, speaks, and performs itself through pretension and exclusivity, the text has, in many ways, come to romanticise it.
While the gentleman and the scholar never truly aligned with one another, it would be a mistake to conclude that this encounter between the two had no lasting effects.